The 5-Second Trick For h4831sc load data

The 5-Second Trick For h4831sc load data

Blog Article

Consult your state and native legislation for that age limitations and legality of ordering and possessing these goods. For safety explanations, we don't take returns on powder. As a result of Particular shipping and delivery necessities for these products, yet another $twenty five.50 Hazardous Substance cost will likely be applied for almost any purchase made up of flammable substance. Contiguous 48 states only. For US sale only.

H4831 will get the job done during the Swift but not serious very well. You can expect to never ever receive the pressures you may need for regularity While using the .223. 760, or H414 will be superior but for many motive I ain't the largest enthusiast of most ball powders.

Liberalism; The extremely hard yet approved Idea that it is totally achievable to select up a turd from the cleanse end.

Operate your load up with the specific powder (sc or common) and great deal you are working with even though. Exact melt away charge does not imply it's going to behave "exactly" a similar. I have observed in excess of a hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

The one variance as I understand it is that the SC was designed to work through powder measures improved (which it does). The for a longer period grains don't feed effectively in any respect in some steps. Thats my 02 :grin:

I've applied H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without having big difference. The only thing could be the limited Minimize provides a little bit more House. Good luck!gun)

I have made use of both of those and used the exact same charges and have not been in the position to convey to any noticable dissimilarities with performance. the SC version meters a little smoother is about all. any comments??

excaliber reported: I have uncovered the precise reverse to get real in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally accurate powder in my three hundred Earn Mag.

WA I'd advocate a slower burner h4831 vs h4831sc that should give improved situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you are loading heavies very long.

Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain measurement, hence, the designation SC or shorter Reduce. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to stream in the powder measures much more easily, helping to relieve the consistent slicing of granules.

As to the 4831 vs 4831SC, They're exactly the same/equivalent powder cept for grain dimensions. Load data is interchangeable.

It has been a little bit, but I did get some h4831 vs h4831sc 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot group now. It truly is a bit slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Thanks for the h4831sc load data recommendation, It is fantastic to realize that I have received selections when a single or one other powder is dried up.

Am i able to suppose that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the Bodily difference but will it have an impact on the burn or velocity? I feel not but I am not 100% absolutely sure.

I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min rates. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it was a very low 60s grain cost in a Norma scenario. Not what I used to be looking for, but exact Nevertheless.